Young Indigenous woman in Peru presents voter ID
Publication | Report/Paper

Engaging Indigenous Peoples in Elections

Identifying International Good Practices through Case Studies in Guatemala, Kenya, and Nepal

Pull Quote Text
[It] is not only the right of all Indigenous Peoples to participate in sovereign state governance; elections can provide essential opportunities to increase the visibility of issues that are important to them, such as land rights, health care, and inclusive decision-making.
Heading
Engaging Indigenous Peoples in Elections report

About 5 percent of the world’s population identify as Indigenous, including more than 5,000 cultures that speak over 4,000 languages. The first global report on Indigenous Peoples and elections since the adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, “Engaging Indigenous Peoples in Elections: Identifying International Good Practices through Case Studies in Guatemala, Kenya, and Nepal” is a collaboration of the Endorois Indigenous Women Empowerment Network (EIWEN – Kenya), Fundación Guillermo Toriello (FGT – Guatemala), the National Indigenous Disabled Women Association Nepal (NIDWAN), and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES).

Developed with support from the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the report provides new insights into the political life of Indigenous Peoples globally, grounded in primary source evidence from Guatemala, Kenya, and Nepal, as well as interviews with international experts. A collaboration between IFES and Indigenous Peoples Organizations, the report includes recommendations for duty-bearers such as election management bodies (EMBs) and rights holders.

The report contains sections on international human rights frameworks; voter registration; voter education; polling; representation, candidacy, and leadership; and intersectionality and indigeneity. Barriers experienced globally by Indigenous Peoples are provided for each section, for example:

  •  Exclusion of traditional and customary Indigenous institutions from state decision-making;
  •  The need to travel long distances or through difficult terrain to register;
  •  Lack of information about elections in Indigenous languages, including Indigenous sign languages;
  •  Polling stations often inaccessible to Indigenous persons with disabilities and lack assistive devices for voting, reducing access to secret balloting;
  • Discrimination against Indigenous candidates;
  • Scant representation of Indigenous Peoples, including Indigenous persons with disabilities, Indigenous women, and young Indigenous persons, in local and national legislative offices.

 

This report was developed through the generous support of Sida and USAID.

Authors

Rebecca Aaberg

Pratima Gurung

Christine Kandie

Lin Valenzuela Méndez

María Velásquez Xón